Plaintiff alleges MidFirst Bank engaged in Age Discrimination

Tucson Federal Building
Tucson Federal Building - Wikipedia
0Comments

A former employee has taken legal action against a major banking institution, alleging age discrimination and retaliation. On November 26, 2025, Ashley Hope filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona against MidFirst Bank. The lawsuit accuses the bank of violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) by subjecting Hope to unfavorable treatment compared to her younger colleagues and retaliating against her after she reported these actions.

Ashley Hope, who had been employed by MidFirst Bank as a Private Client Deposit Specialist since June 20, 2023, claims that despite her extensive experience in banking, her suggestions for improvements were consistently dismissed while younger employees were encouraged to share their ideas. According to the complaint, Hope was demoted in March 2024 to report to a former colleague under the age of forty. Her concerns about this demotion were allegedly ignored by her manager, Frank Portillos, who accused her of having a “victim mentality.” Furthermore, Hope alleges that she was subjected to unjust negative performance audits and was ultimately terminated on July 29, 2024.

The complaint details how Hope’s attempts to address these issues internally were met with hostility and further discrimination. After reporting her concerns to Human Resources representative Lakeisha Cleveland, she was informed that her complaints were unsubstantiated and faced disciplinary action instead. Feeling constructively discharged due to the hostile work environment and lack of resolution from HR, Hope announced her resignation effective August 9, 2024 but was terminated immediately.

Hope’s lawsuit seeks damages for lost wages and benefits due to what she describes as willful violations of ADEA by MidFirst Bank. She is also seeking liquidated damages as well as attorneys’ fees and costs associated with bringing this action forward. The case underscores significant allegations of systemic age bias within the organization and highlights potential failures in addressing employee grievances adequately.

Representing Ashley Hope are attorneys Thomas L. Brown and Mirra L. Carrier from Ernst, Brown & Draper PLLC based in Mesa, Arizona. The case is being heard under Case No.: 2:25-cv-04434-GMS with Judge GMS presiding over the proceedings.

Source: 225cv04434_Hope_v_Bank_Complaint_District_Arizona.pdf


Related

Timothy Courchaine United States Attorney for the District of Arizona

Mexican national convicted of illegal firearm possession after overstaying visa in Arizona

Luis Donaldo Garcia Lopez was convicted by a federal jury for possessing a firearm while unlawfully present in Arizona after overstaying his visa. Authorities say sentencing is scheduled for May as part of broader efforts targeting illegal firearms possession.

Phoenix Federal Building

Plaintiff alleges City Officials’ Selective Enforcement Violated Rights

In a recent court filing dated February 23rd, 2026, Tempe Tavern has accused city officials of targeting their establishment through selective enforcement practices leading to significant financial harm.

Phoenix Federal Building

Plaintiff accuses business partners of misappropriating trade secrets

Estate Documents Pro is suing former business partners for allegedly misappropriating trade secrets related to its proprietary estate planning software platform.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Arizona Courts Daily.