Plaintiff alleges ride-sharing giant neglected safety leading to assault

Phoenix Federal Building
Phoenix Federal Building - Wikipedia
0Comments

A harrowing legal battle has emerged as a plaintiff seeks justice after a traumatic experience with a ride-sharing service. On December 29, 2023, Jaylynn Dean filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Uber Technologies, Inc., and its subsidiary Raiser, LLC. The lawsuit accuses the company of negligence and failing to protect passengers from sexual assault by its drivers.

The complaint details an incident on November 15, 2023, when Dean was allegedly assaulted by an Uber driver during a ride she ordered while intoxicated. The driver reportedly made inappropriate comments before stopping the vehicle and attacking her. Dean immediately reported the incident to both Uber and law enforcement, though she now fears using the service again. The lawsuit argues that Uber’s inadequate safety measures and misleading marketing contributed to the attack, claiming that despite being aware of similar incidents since at least 2014, Uber failed to implement effective preventative measures.

Dean’s case highlights broader allegations against Uber regarding its handling of driver background checks and response to reports of misconduct. The complaint asserts that Uber prioritized growth over passenger safety by employing lax hiring practices and resisting stricter regulations like fingerprinting or FBI database checks for drivers. It also criticizes Uber’s policy of not reporting criminal activity to authorities unless compelled by subpoena, potentially allowing dangerous individuals to continue driving for the platform.

The lawsuit seeks damages for physical and psychological harm suffered by Dean due to the alleged assault. It claims that Uber breached its duty as a common carrier to ensure passenger safety and calls for punitive damages based on what it describes as wanton disregard for rider welfare. The case underscores ongoing concerns about ride-sharing companies’ responsibilities in safeguarding users from harm.

Representing Jaylynn Dean are attorneys Rachel B. Abrams and Adam B. Wolf from Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise, LLP. The case is presided over by judges in the Northern District of California under Case No. 3:23-cv-06708.

Source: 225cv04276_Dean_v_Uber_Technologies_Inc_Complaint_District_Arizona.pdf


Related

Timothy Courchaine United States Attorney for the District of Arizona

Mexican national convicted of illegal firearm possession after overstaying visa in Arizona

Luis Donaldo Garcia Lopez was convicted by a federal jury for possessing a firearm while unlawfully present in Arizona after overstaying his visa. Authorities say sentencing is scheduled for May as part of broader efforts targeting illegal firearms possession.

Phoenix Federal Building

Plaintiff alleges City Officials’ Selective Enforcement Violated Rights

In a recent court filing dated February 23rd, 2026, Tempe Tavern has accused city officials of targeting their establishment through selective enforcement practices leading to significant financial harm.

Phoenix Federal Building

Plaintiff accuses business partners of misappropriating trade secrets

Estate Documents Pro is suing former business partners for allegedly misappropriating trade secrets related to its proprietary estate planning software platform.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Arizona Courts Daily.